The Difference Is Accountability
NOTE: This post is from one of our frequent contributors to this blog, "Birdseye59604.
In
non-aviation jurisdiction there is a law addressing the issue of honest mistakes
being made in working environment. This law states that if the mistake is done by
reason of an honest mistake the error cannot be punished with punitive actions.
This type of law sets up any organization for failure and with no
accountability to job performance. It may be assumed that the non-punitive
clause under SMS is the same thing, but that is as far from the fact as it
could be. SMS does not function in an environment where failure is accepted, or
excused, but has to be embraced in a just culture with job-performance
accountability at all levels.
Accountability is to manage time and place. |
What
is an honest mistake in job-performance anyway? Is there such a thing as a
non-honest mistake? What makes a mistake, or a failure honest or dishonest? Describing
an event as an honest mistake is an attempt to justify an outcome without
accountability and by placing blame on the outcome itself. Applying the honest
mistake concept is a common sense approach to avoid discovery of fact and root
cause.
In this old
picture the quality was not an honest mistake, but root cause discovery which
lead to becoming the Master.
|
A
non-punitive policy is the antidote to the honest mistake approach. In a
non-punitive environment there is accountability at all levels and the root
cause is discovered by at least considering
individual human factors, the environment, supervision and
organizational elements. When understanding the root case an enterprise has been
given a documented opportunity to change processes for a different outcome. The
mistake is no longer an honest mistake, but accountability and accepting an operational
process failure.
BirdsEye59604
No comments:
Post a Comment