Friday, January 11, 2013
A Discussion on RISK!
Yesterday I met with my friends at Transport Canada. It was social gathering but the topic of risk came up. Of course my opinion has always been that Risk Assessment is "voodoo." The basis for my opinion relates to my QA frame of reference. Results of an evaluation should be scientific. Risk seems to be 10% science, probability and Severity, and 90% opinion. I agree risk assessment is essential, that's why I included it my new book, Memory Jogger for SMS, but we need to make it more objective. I will discuss other tools that may accomplish the risk rating with a little more objectivity in a future post. What are your thoughts?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
When SMS is Flawed
When SMS is Flawed By OffRoadPilots A safety management system (SMS) is a system which paints a true image of airports and airline operat...
-
The Building Blocks Of A Safety Management System Another great insight from Helena1320 A Safety Management Sys... -
DRONES: the wave of the FUTURE or a RISKY Business? A risk assessment on the emerging use of Drones in Aviation work by Denn... -
T he Deming Cycle is the KEY to Continuous Improvement! Inforgraphic of the Deming Cycle The Deming Cycle or Plan, Do, Check,...
I agree with your comments about "Risk Assessment". They are very subjective and people tend to have already decided what the risk is before using a risk assessment matrix. They will sometimes simply manipulate the Exposure, Severity and Likelihood to get to the risk level they have already decided upon.
ReplyDeleteAs a Quality Assurance guy, I always had a problem with Risk Assessment. I have asked Risk professionals; tell me how risk assessment is objective? They talk about the expertise of the RA team and experience. To me it is still subjective. Now, I believe RA is absolutely essential in ALL SMS. I prefer to use tools that bring a little more objectivity into the process. As a QA guy I like the Failure Effects Mode and Analysis, FEMA, and Failure Effects Mode and Criticality Analysis, FEMCA. This tools bring in another level of consideration in the RA. In addition to probability and severity, FEMA takes into consideration “exposure.” Another excellent tool is the “Bowtie” diagram. I discuss the Bowtie diagram in another article in this blog. The bowtie diagram gives us an excellent tool to focus the RA team’s thoughts in very specific areas of the event. NOTE: both tools are explained in great detail in the new SMS Memory Jogger II available at dtitraining.com. Don’t get me wrong, Risk Assessment is essential to SMS. I just think companies should seek to make the processes as objective as possible.
ReplyDelete