Good insight from CatalinaNJB
A system without defined roles has
little or no chance to function as intended. Lets for a minute look at a None Destructive
Testing system, or NDT. NDT is a system to detect “undetectable” flaws in a
material, or if production process produces output of flaws in the material. There
are different independent system within an NDT system and none of these systems
are compatible to interact with any of the other systems. The major NDT
inspection systems are X-ray inspection, ultrasound inspection, magnetic
particle Inspection and fluorescent penetrant inspection.
A system of defined
roles within a process.
|
The system of X-ray inspection is
applied to inspect for flaws within a material to relatively fine and defined
resolutions. Ultrasound is also applied
to inspect for flaws within a material, but to a relatively course and
undefined resolutions. Magnetic particle inspection is applied to both internal
and external material flaws discovery. The NDT inspection system applied for
external inspection of flaws is the fluorescent penetrant inspection. Within an
NDT system all these independent systems function to produce an outcome of an
effective system that will function as it was designed to function. None of
these methods of NDT inspections are inferior to one or the other, they are
just a part of one total system to manage, or lead processes to produce a
flawless output.
Within an SMS system the functions
of each system, or defined roles are hidden within human factors. In
contradiction to mechanical systems, human factors include unpredictable
variations. These variations are harnessed by defining roles for each person within
an SMS system.
The accountable executive has
certain defined roles which the AE must perform for the total system to
function, without expectations that another person will pick up where the AE
did not fulfil the role. The role of an accountable executive is to fuel the
SMS system with safety. An effective AE is involved strategically rather than
operationally for the SMS system to have an anchor point within the
organization.
Fill in the blanc and play that role |
Without defining the roles or to
assume a person should know better is often how unsuccessful businesses are
operating. The definition of those systems is for a person to apply variations
and pick up the slack as they see fit. Within an NDT world of systems, this
would compare to placing an aircraft jet-engine disk in the dark room for fluorescent
penetrant inspection and expect an x-ray image to be produced by that process.
The only way, and the process of which flaws in the jet-engine disk is
discovered is to apply the fluorescent penetrant inspection as the process was
intended.
An accountable executive has defined
roles for one reason only, and that if for the SMS system to be effective where
processes are producing outputs of what the processes were designed for. This
does not imply that the processes should not, or does not identify flaws within
the activities, but rather confirm that the processes of an effective SMS system
identify both normal variations and special cause variations. In an NDT world,
a jet-engine disk could be acceptable without flaws, or the process, when
applied correctly, could identify an unlikely flaw in the material.
CatalinaNJB
It is imperative that the Accountable Executive be the champion for the SMS Program. The Operations manager and Director of Maintenance "control" SMS in their areas giving areas while giving delegation to the SMS Manager to run the day to day functions of the program who then, in turn informs the Accountable Executive of the continuous results of the program.
ReplyDelete