Saturday, September 13, 2025

SMS Decisionmaker

 SMS Decision maker

By OffRoadPilots

A safety management system (SMS) enterprise is required

to appoint an accountable executive (AE) who is the key

decisionmaker and authority, and who is responsible for

operations or activities authorized under the

certificate and accountable on their behalf of the

certificate holder for meeting the regulatory

requirements. A condition for accepting the position as

an AE is that they have control of the financial and

human resources that are necessary for the activities

and operations authorized under the certificate.


The responsibility and accountability of the

accountable executive appointed are not affected by the

existence of a person responsible for the maintenance

control system, a person responsible for maintenance,

or a maintenance manager, or the operations manager. A

safety management system is a process and project

management system, where the most desired outcome is

the objective. This does not only include safety, but

also financial outcome. The accountable executive is

responsible for process and financial results. While

the AE is the person making safety in operations key

decisionmaker, the AE does not override their

organizational SMS experts, unless they conduct a new

system analysis, change management assessment, or risk

assessment to justify their decisions.


Risk assessment and risk analysis are related concepts

in the field of risk management, but they refer to

different processes within that framework.

Risk analysis is a more focused and detailed

examination of specific risks identified during the risk assessment phase.


It involves a deeper analysis of

the nature and characteristics of each risk. Key

components of a risk analysis are revisiting and

refining the list of identified risks from the risk

assessment phase, assigning numerical values to the

probability and impact of risks to quantify the overall

risk exposure, developing strategies to manage or

mitigate the impact of identified risks, and

considering different scenarios to understand the

potential outcomes of specific risks.


The primary purpose of risk analysis is to provide

detailed insights into specific risks, allowing for

more informed decision-making and the development of

effective risk mitigation strategies.


In summary, risk

assessment is a

broader process that

involves the initial

identification,

evaluation, and

prioritization of

risks, while risk

analysis is a more

in-depth examination

of specific risks to

better understand

their

characteristics and develop strategies for managing

them. The two processes are interconnected, with risk

analysis often following risk assessment as part of a

comprehensive risk management approach.



Risk assessment is a broader process that involves

identifying potential risks, evaluating theirsignificance, and determining the likelihood of those

risks occurring. Key components of a risk assessment

are identifying and listing potential risks that could

impact a project, organization, or system, assessing

the significance and potential impact of each

identified risk, estimating the likelihood of each risk

occurring, and ranking or categorizing risks based on

their severity and probability.


The main goal of risk assessment is to provide an

overall understanding of the risk landscape and help

prioritize risks for further analysis and management.

System analysis is a process of studying a system or a

complex process with the goal of understanding its

components, interactions, and functionalities. The

primary objective of system analysis is to improve the

efficiency and effectiveness of the system by

identifying problems, finding solutions, and defining

requirements for the development or improvement of the

system.


Key components of a system analysis are analyzing the

system involves gaining a comprehensive understanding

of how it works, its goals, its components, and how

these components interact with each other, system

analysts aim to identify any existing problems or

inefficiencies within the system, which involve

studying user feedback, examining performance metrics,

or conducting interviews with stakeholders.

Once problems are identified, the system analyst works

on defining requirements for improvements or new

features. This involves specifying what the systemshould do, how it should behave, and what constraints

or limitations exist.


System analysts apply modeling techniques to represent

the system visually. This may include flowcharts, data

flow diagrams, entity-relationship diagrams, or other

graphical representations that help in understanding

and communicating the system's structure and

functionality.


Evaluating the costs and benefits of proposed changes

or new systems is crucial in system analysis. This

helps in making informed decisions about the

feasibility and potential return on investment.

System analysts need effective communication skills to

interact with stakeholders, including end-users,

management, and developers. Clear communication is

essential for understanding user needs and expectations

and for conveying system requirements.

System analysts often participate in the planning phase

of system implementation, helping to coordinate the

development and deployment of new systems or

improvements to existing ones.

System analysis is a critical phase in the development

life cycle of a system and is often followed by system

design, implementation, testing, and maintenance. It is

commonly applied in various fields, including

information technology, business process improvement,

and engineering.


A change management analysis refers to the systematic

process of assessing, planning, and implementingchanges within an organization. Change management is a

structured approach to transitioning individuals,

teams, and organizations from their current state to a

desired future state. The analysis aspect of change

management involves evaluating various factors to

understand the potential impact of the proposed changes

and to develop strategies for effectively managing the

transition.


Key components of a change management analysis are:


Í

Current state

assessment by

understanding the

existing

organizational

structure,

processes, and

culture. Identifying

strengths,

weaknesses,

opportunities, and

threats related to

the change.

Stakeholder analysis by identifying and analyzing key

stakeholders who will be affected by the change, and

assessing their interests, concerns, and level of

influence.


Risk analysis Identifying potential risks and

challenges associated with the proposed changes and

developing strategies to mitigate or manage these

risks.Impact analysis by assessing the potential impact of

the changes on various aspects of the organization,

including people, processes, technology, and culture.

Understanding how the changes may affect different

departments, teams, and individuals.


Communication analysis by developing a communication

plan to ensure that information about the changes is

effectively communicated to all stakeholders.

Identifying key messages, communication channels, and

timing for communication.


Training and development analysis by assessing the

skills and competencies required for individuals to

adapt to the changes. Developing a training plan to

address any gaps in knowledge or skills.

Change readiness assessment by evaluating the SMS

enterprise’s readiness for change, including its

culture, leadership support, and overall capacity to

adapt. Identifying factors that may facilitate or

hinder the success of the change initiative.

Measurement and evaluation by establishing key

performance indicators (KPI) to measure the success of

the change initiative. Regularly evaluating progress

and adjusting the change management plan as necessary.

Change management analysis is crucial for ensuring that

the organization navigates through transitions smoothly

and that the intended benefits of the changes are

realized. It involves a combination of data analysis,

stakeholder engagement, and strategic planning to

create a comprehensive approach to managing change

effectively.An assessment that is new with the implementation of

the safety management system is an environmental

assessment.


An environmental assessment (EA) is a process that

evaluates the potential environmental impacts of a

proposed project, plan, or program before it is

implemented. The goal of an environmental assessment is

to identify and analyze potential environmental

effects, consider alternatives, and provide information

to decision-makers and the public. The assessment helps

ensure that environmental considerations are integrated

into the decision-making process, and it may be

required by laws and regulations in many jurisdictions.

An environmental assessment is necessary for various

reasons, primarily to evaluate the potential

environmental impacts of a proposed project, policy, or

development. A new regulatory requirement, standard, or

new SMS policy are alle administrative in nature, but

still requires an environmental assessment to be

completed.


Many countries have laws and regulations that require

environmental assessments for certain types of

projects. These regulations are in place to ensure that

environmental considerations are taken into account

during the planning and decision-making process.

An environmental assessment helps in identifying

potential adverse effects a project may have on the

environment. This includes impacts on air and water

quality, soil, wildlife, ecosystems, and human health.By identifying these impacts, measures can be taken to

minimize or mitigate them.


Environmental

assessments often

involve public

consultation and

engagement. This

allows the public to

provide input and

express concerns

about the proposed

project. Public

participation helps

ensure that diverse

perspectives and potential impacts are considered in

the decision-making process.



The information gathered during an environmental

assessment provides decision-makers with a

comprehensive understanding of the project's potential

environmental consequences. This knowledge allows them

to make informed decisions that balance the benefits of

the project with its potential impacts on the

environment.


Environmental assessments help in assessing the risks

associated with a project and developing strategies to

manage or mitigate those risks. This includes

identifying potential hazards and establishing measures

to prevent or minimize negative impacts.

The findings of an environmental assessment can inform

the design and planning of a project. If significant

environmental impacts are identified, modifications tothe project can be made to reduce or eliminate these

impacts.


Assessing environmental impacts is a key component of

promoting sustainable development. It ensures that

economic and social development occurs in a way that

minimizes harm to the environment, preserving resources

for future generations.

In some cases, international agreements or funding

sources may require environmental assessments as a

condition for approval or funding. This ensures that

projects adhere to globally recognized environmental

standards.


Environmental assessments play a crucial role in

promoting environmentally responsible decision-making,

protecting ecosystems, and fostering sustainable

development. They provide a systematic approach to

evaluating potential impacts and identifying measures

to address environmental concerns associated with human

activities.


There is also a difference between a non-certified

aerodrome and certified aerodrome as it applies to

above ground fuel storage tanks. The compliance

requirements for non-certified aerodromes are more

restrictive than for certified aerodromes. A non-

certified aerodrome may be in non-compliance with the

regulations without their comprehensive plan, while

there are limited requirements certified aerodrome

remain in compliance. There are several benefits for

aerodromes to be certified which are not available to

non-certified aerodromes.Key components of an environmental assessment are:


Scoping: Identifying the environmental aspects and

potential impacts that should be considered in the

assessment.


Baseline Study: Establishing the current environmental

conditions in the area where the project is proposed to

take place.


Impact Assessment: Evaluating the potential positive

and negative effects of the project on the environment,

including factors such as air and water quality,

biodiversity, ecosystems, and human health.


Alternatives

Analysis: Examining

different options or

variations of the

proposed project to

identify

alternatives that

may have fewer

environmental

impacts.


Mitigation Measures:

Proposing measures

to minimize or

offset potential adverse environmental effects.

Public and Stakeholder Involvement: Seeking input and

feedback from the public, local communities, and

relevant stakeholders to ensure that diverse

perspectives are considered.Decision-Making and Documentation: Providing the information gathered during the assessment to decision-

makers who then consider the environmental implications

in their decision. Documentation of the process and

findings is typically required.


Environmental assessments are often a prerequisite for

obtaining permits or approvals for certain projects,

especially those with the potential for significant

environmental impacts. In some cases, if a project is

expected to have more substantial environmental

effects, a more comprehensive environmental impact

assessment may be required.


An SMS enterprise is required to operate with an SMS

policy, or also called their safety policy. A safety

policy must remain in existence, followed, and

understood.

An SMS enterprise is required to base its safety

management system on the safety policy and there is a

clear commitment to safety.

The safety policy is agreed to and approved by the

accountable executive. Approving an SMS policy is a

vision of the path an SMS enterprise is taking, and it

is a business decision and the foundation of their

safety management system. Their SMS manger build the

SMS based on the SMS policy, regulatory requirements,

and their work practices.

The SMS policy is implemented at all levels of the

organization, and is applicable to the AE, managers,

and operations personnel.Their safety policy is reviewed periodically for continuing applicability to regulatory requirements and

their vision of their SMS path forward.


When implementing a new SMS policy and reviewing a

current SMS policy a safety policy assessment is

necessary to maintain integrity of their SMS.

A safety policy assessment is an evaluation or analysis

of an SMS enterprise’s safety policies, objectives,

processes, procedures, and acceptable work practices.

It involves a systematic examination of the policies

and practices that airports and airlines have in place

to ensure the safety in operations, and well-being of

its employees, customers, and other stakeholders.

The assessment typically includes a review of written

safety policies, procedures, and guidelines, as well as

an evaluation of how well these policies are

implemented and followed within the organization. The

goal of a safety policy assessment is to identify areas

where improvements can be made to enhance the overall

safety culture and reduce the risk of accidents,

injuries, or other safety-related incidents.


Key components of a safety policy assessment are:

Policy Documentation Review: Examining written safety

policies and procedures to ensure they are

comprehensive, up-to-date, and aligned with relevant

regulations and industry standards.


Implementation Evaluation: Assessing how well safety

policies are implemented throughout the organization,including the level of awareness among employees and

the effectiveness of training programs.


Compliance Check: Verifying that the organization is in

compliance with the SMS regulations, and operational

regulations as applicable to airports or airlines.

Incident Analysis: Reviewing past incidents, accidents,

or near-misses to identify patterns or areas where

safety policies may need to be strengthened. A review

and analysis of why daily operations are without

incidents is also necessary when conducting incident

analysis.

Communication and Reporting: Evaluating the

effectiveness of communication channels related to

safety, including reporting mechanisms for potential

hazards or incidents.


Continuous Improvement: Assessing the SMS enterprise’s

approach to continuous improvement in safety, such as

the process for reviewing and updating processes,

procedures and acceptable work practices based on

lessons learned and changing circumstances.


Safety policy assessments are crucial for maintaining

the integrity of their SMS and ensuring that an

organization is proactive in addressing risks. They may

be conducted internally by the organization's safety

team or externally by third-party experts. The results

of a safety policy assessment can be used to develop

action plans for improvement and to demonstrate a

commitment to safety to personnel, regulators, and

other stakeholders.An accountable executive is a term used in the context of organizational or project management. This role

refers to an individual who is ultimately responsible

and accountable for the success of a particular

initiative, project, or area within an organization.

The accountable executive is expected to provide

leadership, make key decisions, and ensure that the

goals and objectives are achieved.


The specific

responsibilities and

scope of authority

associated with the

role of an

accountable

executive vary

depending on the

context. In some

cases, it might be a

senior executive

within a company who

oversees a specific

business unit or department. In other situations, it

could be an individual appointed to lead a particular project, ensuring that it stays on track, meets its

objectives, and aligns with the overall strategy of the

organization.


Having an accountable executive is crucial for clear

lines of responsibility, effective decision-making, and

overall policy success, and in achieving organizational

objectives and goals. This individual is often held

responsible for the outcomes and is accountable to

stakeholders, including shareholders, customers, and

employees.As the SMS decisionmaker and the final authority of the

safety management system, the accountable executive is

responsible for accepting or rejecting the different

analyses necessary for a successful SMS.


OffRoadPilots






SMS Decisionmaker

  S MS  Decision maker By OffRoadPilots A safety management system (SMS) enterprise is required to appoint an accountable executive (AE) wh...